- Strike had never discovered how Uncle Ted had found out where they were living; all he knew was that he and Lucy had let themselves into the squat one afternoon to find their mother’s enormous brother standing in the middle of the room, threatening Shumba with a bloody nose. Within two days, he and Lucy were back in St. Mawes. -CC
- Why Uncle Ted supported the Gunners, when he had lived all his life in Cornwall, was a question Strike had never asked. -SW
- Precisely what Leda had said in the note she left on the kitchen table, Strike had never known. -TB
- Why Dave Polworth, pocket don of the class, had decided to befriend the new boy had never been satisfactorily explained, even to Strike...By the end of that first day Polworth had become both friend and champion, making it his business to impress upon their classmates all the reasons that Strike was worthy of their respect: he was a Cornishman born, a nephew to Ted Nancarrow of the local lifeguard, he didn’t know where his mum was and it wasn’t his fault if he spoke funny. -TB
- Jonny Rokeby: "There's a bunch of stuff you don't know, about your mother and all her f*cking men."-TB
6. "There's nothing heroic about being in the wrong place at the wrong time."
"You're a decorated veteran."
"I wasn't decorated for being blown up. That happened before."
"You've never told me that." She turned to face him, but he refused to be sidetracked.
Who is the one person alive who could potentially hold the answers to all six points? Uncle Ted certainly knows #1-3 and #6, and could well have at leasr some knowledge about #4 and 5, too. Now that we know how Strike learned Latin, the story of how he got his medal is the last major event in his personal past about which we still wonder, While it's hard to understand what Ted's preferred football team and little Dave's preschool behavior could have to do with the ultimate mystery of the series-- who killed Leda?--#1, 3 and 5 could all be relevant to that question.
One interesting trait of dementia patients is that they tend to lose memories in reverse order, the more recent ones first, then the older ones. For example, my grandmother, even near the end of her life, could recognize a picture of my father as a young man, but could not recognize the 60-year old man sitting beside her as her son. My father, who also died of dementia, although he had lived in the same house for nearly 40 years, would give the street he lived on as a child when asked his address.
Ted, therefore, could well find himself, like the Hogwarts ghosts, living in the past. He could well remember events from Strike's childhood, but not remember the reasons that he and Joan chose not to tell him once he was an adult. He might cease to recognize his adult nephew, and say something about his sister to Strike, thinking he is a stranger. He could even reveal something about the Nancarrow family that pre-dates Strike's birth, such as the reason the young Leda was so eager for a new dress and a new name, or why Ted defied his father to escape into the Army.
Personally, i'd love it if Strike took Robin to the care facility to meet Ted, or, if she showed up to offer moral support during a difficult time, and Ted spilled the beans about the medal to her. Or course, there are other ways secrets could come out, too. The job of cleaning out the St. Mawes home and preparing it for sale will likely fall to Strike and Lucy; maybe the note is still there.
In any case, it is likely that Ted alone holds some crucial information about Strike's past, and despite his dementia, he could well be positioned to, like the Hogwarts ghosts, impart this knowledge in a way that will illuminate Strike's present.
*The allusion here is to Order of the Phoenix, where Aunt Petunia reveals that she learned about dementors when she heard "that awful boy" telling Lily about them. Harry responds angrily, telling her to just say his parents' names his that's who she's talking about. Petunia does not respond, and readers will later learn that she was talking about not Lily and James, but Lily and Snape.
I like the idea of needed information emerging from Uncle Ted as his mind fails. That's a clever plot twist and could be very dramatic. However, in terms of solving Leda's murder, we need someone who would have been around enough to see something or hear something when the murder happened or shortly thereafter. It is possible that person may not know that the information - the clue - they're carrying is important, but at some point our star detective will put that clue together with other information and solve the case. I see two possible clue carriers: Shanker, who surely was in touch with Leda, and Sir Randolph Whittaker. As I recall Sir Whittaker stepped in fairly quickly to rescue Strike's maternal half-brother Switch Whittaker. Since Switch Whittaker has barely been mentioned in the novels, and yet is a blood relation of Strike, why bother to even have him in the story unless he will serve some plot development in the future? Time - and JKR - will tell.
ReplyDeleteDavid, I absolutely think Switch will play some major role in the series, and probably have some relevance to Leda's death. His existence was even shoe-horned into the TV adaptation of Career of Evil, with Whittaker mentioning him during his encounter with Strike, which he did not do in the book. Sir Randolph was been one of my major suspects from the time we learned of him, (see: https://www.hogwartsprofessor.com/the-true-taxonomy-of-leda-killer-suspects-why-sir-randolph-whittaker-is-the-likely-culprit/) since I figured he would be eager for a respectable (and preferably male) heir after the wastrels that his daughter and grandson turned out to be. The desire for a suitable person to inherit the family estate and/or titles been a relatively common theme throughout the series, with the Chiswell, Ross, and, most recently, the Graves family all being concerned with this matter.
DeleteUnfortunately, JKR/RG's inconsistency with timelines impedes our ability to discern clues from the snippets of his childhood we have seen. TRG, for instance, insisted Switch was barely a year old when his mother died and he was adopted by his great-grandparents; earlier it was clear that he was almost two. Leda was said to be 6 months pregnant at Strike's 18th (November 1992) and born (presumably prematurely) in December 1992. Leda is supposed have died mid-way through Strike's second year at Oxford (late 1994), by which time Strike should have been 20. A more egregious example was the changing of Strike's age at the Norfolk commune from 8 to 12.
I speculated here (https://www.hogwartsprofessor.com/strike-speculation-what-if-leda-and-whittaker-never-had-custody-of-switch/) that Whittaker and Leda might have lost custody of Switch before his mother's death, but TRG confirmed that he lived in the squat at least until Strike left for university.
The two Switch-related tidbits that TRG dropped were 1) the fact that Shanker seemed to remember Switch better than Strike did (which makes sense, given that he stayed behind when Strike went to Oxford) and 2) Strike raising the possibility of Lucy having a relationship with Switch. These are both interesting because both Shanker and Lucy are candidates for the offspring part of the the offspring-spouse co-murderers my Double Wedding Band model predicts for the final resolution of book 10. (https://fartingsofafaculty.blogspot.com/2023/11/rings-double-bands-stars-and-asterisks.html)
Thank you for the comments and the inspiration, David!
I think Ted as a ghost/source of information from the past is the best prediction I’ve seen so far. Thank you!
ReplyDeleteThis is so interesting! And very like JKR to scatter breadcrumbs throughout the books. I can definitely see how Ted's story could be a kind of parallel to Snape's, filling in some of the gaps and leading Strike to ask Shanker etc. the right questions. I love this, I'll be looking out for signs in book 8!
ReplyDelete